• legal rhetoric

My Ph.D. student Ryan Malphurs has an excellent co-authored article on Supreme Court oral argument here at The Jury Expert.

• Jim Aune's blog
• Login or register to post comments

• Free Speech
• legal rhetoric
• rhetoric of religion

The non-Establishment principle trumps student free speech. And I am puzzled, but I haven't read the briefs yet. I can't help but think that a valedictorian's message is not the school district speaking, and that, yet again, we don't really understand how to make the First Amendment *mean* rhetorically in the absence of lawyerly clause-bound readings:

• Jim Aune's blog
• Login or register to post comments
• Read more

• legal rhetoric

Listening to heavy metal music can get you the death penalty in Texas. As I always say to my friends outside the state, it really is worse than you imagine. Surely, even if you support the death penalty under certain circumstances, you can recognize a legal travesty when you see one? It's all about feeding the base with blood.

• Jim Aune's blog
• 1 comment
• Read more

• legal rhetoric

Scalia just doesn't get it, does he? From Dahlia Lithwick's article on today's oral arguments:

• Jim Aune's blog
• Login or register to post comments
• Read more

• legal rhetoric

Not being much of one for celebrity culture, I've been trying not to think about Roman Polanski's arrest, but I keep getting drawn back to it (perhaps because it comes on the heels of the 40th anniversary of the Tate-LaBianca murders). Here's one of the more thoughtful pieces I've read. ThickCulture is a great blog, btw.

• Jim Aune's blog
• Login or register to post comments

• legal rhetoric

Jonathan Turley gives us his list. I think mine is the same, although I'd put in a word for Robert Jackson. Glad to see my all-time hero Hugo Black made the list. And that the egregious Frankfurter did not.

• Jim Aune's blog
• Login or register to post comments

• legal rhetoric
• wankery

Watching the Sotomayor hearings this week is painful.

• Jim Aune's blog
• 3 comments
• Read more

• legal rhetoric

After the last 8 years I didn't think I could be shocked by anything anymore, but the shooting of Dr. Tiller has upset me more than anything in recent memory. If you read the stories of the women who went to his clinic, Dr. Tiller looks more and more like a saint. Jack Balkin asks the following questions about how to deal with Christian terrorism (he uses the questions as an analogy for the right-wing defense of detention and torture, but I'm inclined to take them seriously--the full blog post is here):

• Jim Aune's blog
• 2 comments
• Read more

• legal rhetoric

You get the stupid-ass British libel laws. (But Pringles ARE snacks.)

• Jim Aune's blog
• Login or register to post comments

• Free Speech
• legal rhetoric

A Wichita doctor is murdered as he goes into church this morning. Bill O'Reilly has been targeting him for some time. Under the "imminent lawless conduct" standard of Brandenburg v. Ohio, should O'Reilly/Fox News be liable for damages? How do the mass media complicate the Brandenburg standard? If a Muslim cleric in the US had done the same, would he be in jail right now?

• Jim Aune's blog
• 4 comments
• Read more