The Blogora: The Rhetoric Society of America

 

Rhetoric and Religion: Specific Questions


Submitted by syntaxfactory on April 24, 2012 - 10:46pm


So let's get down to brass tacks:
The NCA Distinguished Scholar Award winners are listed below. If the winner listed is dead and you know their religious affiliation and feel comfortable sharing it, please do. If YOU are one of the winners listed below and you feel comfortable sharing your religious affiliation, please do.

Will this help? I don't know. There's a passage in a book edited by Van Eemeren in which Wenzel claims that he and Brockriede basically "invented" the same distinction in rhetorical studies at the same time (1978). Woot, I guess. But what if we learned that biographically, they come from different religious traditions --does that give us a hermeneutic to offer texture to distinguish their common innovations? When Gronbeck calls Ehninger a Modernist Rhetorician, does that contain within it implicit claims about orientation toward religion? Or could it be inflected if we understood something about Ehninger's religious orientation?

Religion, in other words, is a key hermeneutic for biographical criticism of philosophers, literary figures etc. - what is its place as a hermeneutic for the history of our common rhetorical field?

(Composition colleagues, I will be posting a similar list soon.)

1992
Carroll C. Arnold
Samuel L. Becker
Ernest G. Bormann
Karlyn Kohrs Campbell
Dennis S. Gouran
Franklyn S. Haiman
Kathleen H. Jamieson
George Kennedy
Gerald R. Miller
Robert L. Scott

1993
Jesse Delia
Roderick P. Hart
Mark L. Knapp

1994
Wayne Brockriede*
James J. Murphy
David Zarefsky

1995
Wallace A. Bacon
A. Craig Baird* -- Attended a Prebyterian Seminary -- Possibly Presbyterian?
Donald C. Bryant*
Douglas Ehninger*
Walter R. Fisher
Wilbur Samuel Howell*
Everett Lee Hunt*
Franklin H. Knower*
Marie Hochmut Nichols*
Herbert Simons
Karl Wallace*
Herbert A. Wichelns*
James A. Winans*
Charles Wollbert*

1996
Edwin Black
Beverly Whitaker Long
Bruce E. Gronbeck

1997
Lawrence Grossberg
Lloyd F. Bitzer
Thomas W. Benson

1998
Thomas B. Farrell
Julia T. Wood
Henry W. Johnstone Jr.

1999
Judee K. Burgoon
Linda L. Putnam

2000
James R. Andrews
Robert P. Newman
Ellen A. Wartella

2001
Michael C. Leff

2002
Celeste M. Condit
Michael S. Schudson

2003
No Honorees

2004
Stanley A. Deetz
Robert Hariman
David R. Seibold
Frans H. van Eemeren
2005
Joseph N. Cappella
Gerard A. Hauser
Martin J. Medhurst
Marshall Scott Poole

2006
John Waite Bowers
Brant R. Burleson
Doris A. Graber

2007
Lance Bennett
W. Norwood Brigance*
Robert Entman
Howard Giles

2008
James A. Aune
Leslie A. Baxter
Charles R. Berger
J. Michael Hogan

2009
Carole Blair
Stephen E. Lucas
Michael E. Roloff
Edward Schiappa

2010
John A. Daly
Steven W. Duck
Karen Tracy
Joseph Turow

2011
Clifford G. Christians
Gail T. Fairhurst
Dennis K. Mumby
Barbie Zelizer

Submitted by Jim Aune on April 25, 2012 - 1:59pm.

I think it's actually a very important question, David, although let me complexify it a little. Several of the Jews on the list are, to my knowledge at least, NOT synagogue-goers. Two of them are. But all them would have been murdered by Hitler or targeted by radical Islamists. Similarly, I know many identify as "culturally Catholic," and, say, Tom Farrell, my PHD advisor who I know left the Church fairly early nonetheless had a Catholic funeral. It's sort of like the annoying "people of faith" thing I hear so often lately as a lame attempt at inclusion--Jews don't have a "faith" per se, simply varying degrees of "observance," and for groups like, say, Parsees or Sikhs for whom race/ethnicity/observance are inextricably entwined in ways that make no sense to US cafeteria Christianity, there are some problems. But it's funny, perhaps because I'm a Midwesterner and one who studies religion, that I actually know the affiliations of so many people on this list. .

Submitted by Jim Aune on April 25, 2012 - 2:58pm.
Submitted by Daniel L Smith (not verified) on April 25, 2012 - 8:24am.

I can see this "hermeneutic" endeavor getting very messy (and contentious) quite easily - which is not to say it isn't worth pursuing.

DS

Submitted by syntaxfactory on April 25, 2012 - 12:13pm.

...and I'm not really expecting any living people to post their own religious orientations. After all, of living people, we respect a division between public and private, professional and private, that we do not distinguish for the dead, for whom all aspects of biography are open game for understanding their intellectual work.

Submitted by Jim Aune on April 26, 2012 - 11:31am.

I seem to recall that Ehninger attended Trinity Episcopal Church in Iowa City. And Gronbeck is Lutheran.

Submitted by Jim Aune on April 26, 2012 - 11:37am.

Putnam, Southern Baptist
Hariman, Presbyterian (northern)
Hauser and Medhurst, RC
Hogan, UCC
Christians, Reformed

Judging just by last names, you have a disproportionate number of Jews, of course.

Submitted by Jim Aune on April 26, 2012 - 2:15pm.

"Rhetoric" exists right now as an odd conjuncture of writing, political/social theory, and the "field formerly known as speech." As Pat Gehrke and Josh Gunn and Bill Keith, among others, have taught us: Speech was weird. It never fit in to the dominant Discourse of the American University, but the untold story is that the US has been a mostly Protestant nation for most of its history, and "preaching" displaced ritual and the sacraments as the heart of worship. It is not surprising, then, that "speech" grew up as an at least partially cultural expression of the peculiar features of American life. One can no longer assume, of course, that people with PHD's in COMM, or even in Rhetoric, can display even rudimentary public speaking skills. Check out RSA in May. I won't name any names, but it fucking amazes me. I think I'm going to start campaigning to add a course in Voice and Articulation as a performance course option in our major. Right? Right? Um?

Submitted by syntaxfactory on April 26, 2012 - 10:33pm.

It's funny you should note that; Bill and Pat point out the attempt to distinguish the Speech Art types (the SAA members of 1890-1920) from the Public Speaking types without any mention of education in homiletics or preaching, right?

There were the elocutionists on the left, the academic teachers of public speaking on the right, and the teachers of preachers where? Affect, rationality, and faith, where faith is absent in the narrative?

Submitted by Jim Aune on April 26, 2012 - 10:58pm.

methinks it was so taken for granted that it didn't come up.

Submitted by syntaxfactory on April 24, 2012 - 10:48pm.

I started by adding A. Craig Baird's possible Presbyterian roots based on seminary attendance.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.