Recent comments
- CHE on Boys
20 hours 49 min ago - an unscientific survey
1 day 21 hours ago - Good Morning
2 days 22 hours ago - Filing Cabinets
2 days 22 hours ago - other answers
3 days 28 sec ago - Evernote
3 days 43 min ago - Research Techniques
3 days 2 hours ago - PR
5 days 22 hours ago - I agree . . .
5 days 22 hours ago - The Powers That Be
1 week 1 hour ago
Tags
blogging
campaign rhetoric 2008
legal rhetoric
political rhetoric
politics
rhetoric
rhetoric of economics
rhetoric of religion
technology
theorizing
the profession
wankery
Blogroll
- A Collage of Citations
- Amateur Humanist
- Blogging Pedagogy
- Blogologie
- Blogos
- Clinamen
- Collin Vs. Blog
- Complex Rhetoric
- Crooked Timber
- CultureCat
- Dangerous and Loud
- Digital B
- Earth Wide Moth
- Edu*Rhetor
- First Efforts
- Foolscap
- Founder-Chic
- Kairos News
- Mere Rhetoric
- New Pathos
- No Caption Needed
- Oratorical Animal
- Our Undemocratic Constitution
- PCARE
- Political Cotton Candy
- Public Reason: A Blog for Political Philosophers
- Red Rhetoric
- Rhetorica
- Rhetorical Imprints
- Slashdot
- Spinuzzi
- The Agon
- The Chronicle: Wired Campus
- The Philosophist
- The Pinocchio Theory
- The Rosewater Chronicles
- The Senses of Rhetoric
- The Valve
- Theoryville
- UGA Rendition
- Viz.
- Work/Space
- Working Blue
- Yellow Dog
Links
Search

The Blogora is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Isn't the blog writing about matters of public concern? How different are Zimmerman's reviews from what students might leave on Pick-a-Prof or a similar website? Either way, the burden of proof is going to rest on proving fault of some kind on Zimmerman's part (falsity is not enough).
I guess as the 1940 AAUP Statement notes, "Academic freedom in its teaching aspect is fundamental for the protection of the rights of the teacher in teaching and of the student to freedom in learning." With one in trouble, it's not a surprise the other is beginning to show signs of distress.
On that note, Dana Cloud frequently receives hate mail (she has an article forthcoming in which she analyzes it), and yet David Horowitz's campaign marches on. Has anyone sued Horowitz yet?
Great new term, and it seems like that is what's going on here. Were the comments hateful drivel I might think differently, but based on what's in the Higher Ed article, the comments just seem like blunt (perhaps poorly written) criticism.