Recent comments
- CHE on Boys
18 hours 22 min ago - an unscientific survey
1 day 19 hours ago - Good Morning
2 days 20 hours ago - Filing Cabinets
2 days 20 hours ago - other answers
2 days 21 hours ago - Evernote
2 days 22 hours ago - Research Techniques
3 days 18 min ago - PR
5 days 20 hours ago - I agree . . .
5 days 20 hours ago - The Powers That Be
6 days 23 hours ago
Tags
blogging
campaign rhetoric 2008
legal rhetoric
political rhetoric
politics
rhetoric
rhetoric of economics
rhetoric of religion
technology
theorizing
the profession
wankery
Blogroll
- A Collage of Citations
- Amateur Humanist
- Blogging Pedagogy
- Blogologie
- Blogos
- Clinamen
- Collin Vs. Blog
- Complex Rhetoric
- Crooked Timber
- CultureCat
- Dangerous and Loud
- Digital B
- Earth Wide Moth
- Edu*Rhetor
- First Efforts
- Foolscap
- Founder-Chic
- Kairos News
- Mere Rhetoric
- New Pathos
- No Caption Needed
- Oratorical Animal
- Our Undemocratic Constitution
- PCARE
- Political Cotton Candy
- Public Reason: A Blog for Political Philosophers
- Red Rhetoric
- Rhetorica
- Rhetorical Imprints
- Slashdot
- Spinuzzi
- The Agon
- The Chronicle: Wired Campus
- The Philosophist
- The Pinocchio Theory
- The Rosewater Chronicles
- The Senses of Rhetoric
- The Valve
- Theoryville
- UGA Rendition
- Viz.
- Work/Space
- Working Blue
- Yellow Dog
Links
Search

The Blogora is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Here's Gordon Mitchell's shout out to Jon Favreau through an Isocratean lens:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-mippq7hms
Got it downloaded. Just curious - what were Bloom's biggest contributions to rhetoric? Anything particularly noteworthy in the thesis? The Closing was really praised to the skies by several of the figures of my study - though I imagine "traditionalists" like Kirk and Gottfried would find more than a few things to be annoyed by - and I want to delve into it at some point.
So good, so far . . .
"So we find Isocrates in a no-man's land between rhetoric and philosophy - too philosophic for the politician, and too aware of the immediate and the changing for the philosopher. . . . Plato and Demosthenes are secure in their positions because they are too obviously what they are to be completely misapprehended. It is possible, however, that his assignment to limbo is not entirely the fault of Isocrates but that it is our categories which are not quite appropriate." p. 3-4
"Politics is not merely a protective adjunct of humanity, but coexstensive with it. The other terms, like economics [we're sadly and slowly remembering], are comprehended by politics, inasmuch as they represent a fragmented part of the need that establishes civil society. To analyze this aspect separately would be to misunderstand it." p.9
We should study _politeia_ . . .
Much love and gratitude for sharing the diss . . .
DG