Recent comments
- yes...
1 day 8 hours ago - if only
1 day 11 hours ago - Splitting the Difference
2 days 1 hour ago - to continue to generalize...
2 days 6 hours ago - Tangentially related generalization
2 days 19 hours ago - Whining...
3 days 21 hours ago - exhibit A
4 days 6 hours ago - Agreed.
4 days 6 hours ago - anniversaries of violence
5 days 22 hours ago - litcrit
5 days 22 hours ago
Tags
blogging
campaign rhetoric 2008
Humor
intellectual property
legal rhetoric
political rhetoric
politics
religion
rhetoric
technology
the profession
visual rhetoric
Blogroll
- A Collage of Citations
- Amateur Humanist
- Blogging Pedagogy
- Blogologie
- Blogos
- Clinamen
- Collin Vs. Blog
- Complex Rhetoric
- Crooked Timber
- CultureCat
- Dangerous and Loud
- Digital B
- Earth Wide Moth
- Edu*Rhetor
- First Efforts
- Founder-Chic
- Kairos News
- Mere Rhetoric
- New Pathos
- No Caption Needed
- Oratorical Animal
- Our Undemocratic Constitution
- PCARE
- Political Cotton Candy
- Public Reason: A Blog for Political Philosophers
- Red Rhetoric
- Rhetorica
- Rhetorical Imprints
- Slashdot
- Spinuzzi
- The Agon
- The Chronicle: Wired Campus
- The Philosophist
- The Pinocchio Theory
- The Rosewater Chronicles
- The Senses of Rhetoric
- The Valve
- Theoryville
- UGA Rendition
- Viz.
- Work/Space
- Working Blue
- Yellow Dog
Links
Search

The Blogora is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
This is very important work, Adria, and you are totally on the right track. A few questions:
1. What does "ideological terrain" mean? Do you need to disaggregate this concept into, say, legal scholarship, judicial opinions, politicians, academe? I am still puzzled at the skepticism about free speech that has sunk into far-left (I don't know what the right word is) circles since the 1980's--partially MacKinnon/Dworkin, CLS, the legacy of Marcuse's "Repressive Tolerance, but perhaps also a reflection of political impotence, making it easier to police speech rather than change laws/social policy. We also like a clear understanding of free speech in relation to academic freedom. It is unclear what my free speech rights in the classroom are, for instance.
2. The central philosophical problem is the speech/conduct distinction. But related is the unstable relationship between the religion clauses and the free speech clause (see Rosenberger v. UVA, which conflated public university refusal to subsidize an evangelical student publication with violation of free speech). Hugo Black (I know I'm the only Black devotee left, probably) saw some of these problems in Cohen v. California and elsewhere, when he wanted to draw a bright line between speech and conduct, lest the average citizen get confused about what free speech was. I think the change from speech to "expression" was disastrous in this regard. I deeply dislike Judith Butler's Excitable Speech for a number of reasons but her appropriation of J.L. Austin on performatives is an essential starting point for this discussion.
3. How that relates to your case studies, especially Hempstead, is that not only are we confused still about speech/conduct, but also about reasonable "time, place, and manner" restrictions.
4. Do new media make a difference? The ability of the 'Net to circumvent censorship seems relevant.
5. How "doctrinal" do you want to be in this dissertation--most of the research questions are descriptive rather than normative. I don't know what the right answer is here.
I'm sure I'll have more thoughts, later. Hope this helps.
sounds a lot -- structurally -- to make the sentences -- like how i used "discursive stage" in citizen critics. "disaggregate" isn't a word my reviewers -- mailloux and leff -- used, though they didn't like how much weight the term carried. adria might need the term, however unpacked, to get to the more important case studies. my two crowns.
terrain - topoi -- bioregions of discourse/ideology.
where DID I pick up that ugly word "disaggregate." My advisor used to say "unpack." But I don't like that either.
Let me "disaggregate" and "upack," and I'll post some thoughts soon. As I go through this process, I'll post my work-in-progress. :) I am eternally grateful for the thoughts and feedback, and hope that continued discussion can help not just my research, but other grads going through this process.